Post by AlohacyberianPost by Andrew NightingaleI am visiting the big island of Hawaii in January on a RTW trip from the
UK. I would like to stay in Kona for 3 nights and Hilo for 3 nights. I do
not drive. (I am thinking of the "Seaside" hotels).
What is the most practical method to get from one to the other?
I am informed that public transport is very limited on the island. On the
other hand, the island's own website talks of a free public transport
system. Would it be practicable for this particular journey one time? I
would very much like to hear from anyone that has used the Hawaii big
island public transport system.
I am informed that a taxi from one place to the other would be absurdly
expensive. That's vague. Could anyone estimate an actual figure? Is there
a place I can look up fares? Could someone reading this in Hawaii put me
in contact with a taxi driver for a quote?
The possibility of a flight from Kona to Hilo arises. Is that the sanest
idea?
Or would it be most sensible to stay in Kona for the whole period?
I am keen to fit in a whale-watching trip, which seems easiest from Kona,
but also to see something of the famous volcanic activity, which seems
easiest from Hilo.
I'm almost positive it would be cheaper to fly from Kona to Hilo than to
take a taxi which would probably be somewhere between two-hundred fifty
and six hundred dollars. But, look into the tour buses when you arrive,
you'll find a plethora of information both at the airport and at your
hotel. I'm sure all your questions here are quite common questions put to
concierges at hotels. Personally, I like Hilo (jungle side) better than
the Kona side (desert side) - so I'd recommend you stick with your initial
plan. Hilo is less touristy and much greener. Hilo does get much more
rain, but no more than a lot of places in the U.K. and the major
difference is that the rain in Hawaii isn't cold! You are invited to
~ http://keith.martin.home.att.net/page9B.html - where you'll find no
pop-ups, no advertising, no cookies and nothing for sale! Bon voyage. KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/
My question to you, Keith, is whether you hold yourself accountable for both
what you post here and what is in that website of yours. That is, do you
stand behind your statements? I note no references/links/citations...just
plain unsubstantiated verbiage. In the lingo of islands, just talk, talk,
talk...aka "shooting off wid da mout". Or are you just blowing the usual
Hawaii tourist smoke stuff for which you do not hold yourself
accountable...stuff that sounds really, really good but when examined has no
substance? After all, you have yet to answer my question posed to you a
long time ago -
"Do you agree that a maker of a statement is accountable for that
statement? A simple 'yes' or 'no' from you will suffice."
Take, for example, that statement of yours today - "Hilo does get much more
rain, but no more than a lot of places in the U.K...." You hold yourself
accountable for those words as per Hilo getting "...no more than a lot of
places in the U.K...." as far as rain is concerned? You stand behind them?
If so, please indeed before all of us here back them up with
references/links/citations. Just to keep the analysis/comparisons on the
apples to apples level, please when providing those
references/links/citations use UK locales at sea level...as Hilo is.... with
population equal to or greater than that of Hilo. I say you are just
blowing smoke much as a squid shoots off a cloud of ink simply to confuse
and mislead.
Allow me to point out that the average annual rainfall in Hilo is of the
order of 130 inches plus per year as per the US National Weather Service:
http://www.prh.noaa.gov/pr/hnl/climate/phto_clim.php
And the average annual rainfall in each of Northern Ireland, Scotland,
England, and Wales...the entities that make up the United Kingdom...falls
far, far, far short of 130 inches, as per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_the_United_Kingdom
England - 44 inches
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/areal/england.html
Wales - 56 inches
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/areal/wales.html
Northern Ireland - 43 inches
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/areal/n_ireland.html
Scotland - 60 inches
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/areal/scotland.html
And average annual rainfall for a sea level locale with population equal to
or greater than Hilo in each of those entities:
England: Blackpool @ 53.30°N 3.70°W 30.6 inches
http://www.worldclimate.com/cgi-bin/data.pl?ref=N53W003+2100+0331201G1
Wales: Cardiff @ 51.40°N 3.30°W 36.2 inches
http://www.worldclimate.com/cgi-bin/data.pl?ref=N51W003+2100+03715W
Northern Ireland: Belfast @ 54.65°N 6.20°W 33.5 inches
http://www.worldclimate.com/cgi-bin/data.pl?ref=N54W006+2100+03917W
Scotland: Edinburgh @ 55.95°N 3.30°W 26.2 inches
http://www.worldclimate.com/cgi-bin/data.pl?ref=N55W003+2100+03160W
Instead of answering my accountability question - one which has a direct
bearing on your posts such as today's as I have demonstrated before all the
folks here - you instead employ the KM2 of ignoring my question....as per
today, the Keith Martin of non sequiturs, red herrings, and ad hominems...as
in your other post here in this newsgroup today, the Alvin Toda of crawling
away for awhile under your rock, and your six year old kid's taunt "Yes or
no. KM." Bottom line, you still duck my question on statement
accountability.
Quack, quack!